Sushi Money

“Out with the old, in with the new” as the saying goes.  Timely words for welcoming a new year that will hopefully be a far cry from last year, at least financially speaking.    For many of us the new year also means a new commitment to getting rid of debt and increasing savings.  In short, through circumstance or necessity, many of our priorities have changed.  

Jim Citrin looks at Getting Back to Basics in 2009, describing how changing priorities have affected business perspectives:

“The era of unchecked consumerism and financial excess had the insidious effect of devaluing everything. Why save money when you could borrow to get whatever you wanted? Why hang on to clothes and appliances when you could just go to the store and buy new ones? Why make structural improvements to your business operations or deepen customer relationships when you could push more stuff to get the growth that Wall Street demanded?”

“In one fell swoop, these attitudes have ground to a halt. They’ve been replaced by millions of healthier conversations in conference rooms and around kitchen tables about how to save, conserve, and prioritize.”

The article looks for a silver lining, examining how we can reconnect and make the best of the difficult times we live in.  I appreciate his views because it makes the simple point that we have a choice with how to respond to the current economic environment.  Sit around and wring our hands?  No. We need to get up and do something about our situation, and work to improve our lives and fortunes.

Admittedly the really tough part of the economic challenge we face is how far it has reached into people’s lives.  Between housing, the stock market and the credit crunch, the financial challenges have touched every level of the socio-economic spectrum.   For those who have lived too long on debt and excessive borrowing, the money faucet has been turned off.  Now they’re struggling to save, get by and get rid of that debt.  Others are struggling with layoffs and trying to find a job.  And even for those who saved and invested diligently through the years, the stock market’s downward spiral has demoralized investors into wondering why they ever invested in the first place.

A lot of frugal and industrious folks today are wondering if they should have just spent more of their money when they had it, instead of scrimping and saving through the years only to watch it disappear in a few months.

Most of all it’s just hard to feel confident about our choices right now.  And we’re shocked when reading about financial scandals and corruption.  It’s no surprise that many people have moved their assets to cash in CDs and savings accounts, deciding that something is better than nothing.   Nothing wrong with that, especially if you need the money in 3-5 years, or you are already retired and may need that money for healthcare or living expenses.   But the rate of return on those accounts is really low, and most planners will still target a growth or dividend component in the overall allocation mix if possible. 

Dividends are also king right now for investors, and there’s nothing like getting paid to hold a good company in stock.  Fixed income investments also may offer some of the best opportunities in the next few years.  Cash-wise I’m at least putting some money into a good quality high-yield savings account such as with ING, and money market accounts such as Vanguard Prime.  If you want treasuries (who doesn’t!?), Vanguard also has several treasury mutual funds.

And I’m certainly still investing in mutual funds and selective stocks, taking advantage of low prices and increasing savings and investments where I can afford it.  Is that a gamble?  Not for me, since I don’t plan to need the money for 10+ years.  If you feel like it’s gambling, then that should tell you something about your risk tolerance, and you should look for a more conservative asset mix. 

But if you’ve got decades until retirement, there’s no better time than right now to accumulate investment shares.  As long as your financial life is in order of course.  I call it my Big Three, and they remain the central focus of our financial lives:  Cut Spending, Pay down Debt, and Increase Savings.  After the first two are under control, then I think about investing.

If you’re feeling bad about your mutual fund losses, most of us can be glad we didn’t join the Dubious 60% Club, and that’s not 60% up…  Bill Miller was a high-flyer for about 15 years as a leading mutual fund manager, but for the past few years- well mostly last year- he has crashed and burned.   It just goes to show that anyone can make poor choices and lose money in the market.  Does that mean he’s sulking in some corner office, licking his wounds?  Absolutely not.  He’s still in their fighting and even managed to beat the S&P 500 for December 2008.   

As we ring in the new year, there’s a host of excellent pracitical advice out there.  Here’s a rundown on some of my favorites:

• The Wall Street Journal offers an eclectic mix of insight for How to Fix Your Life in 2009.  “Exuberance and excess have made way for prudence and pragmatism. Frugality is, once again, a virtue. To help you settle into this strange new world, our reporters have dug deep into their beats…”

• SmartMoney.com shows us 7 Ways to Save in 2009.   “Reducing monthly expenses and saving more money is the must-make resolution for 2009.”

• Kiplinger.com offers a classic article from a few years go reviewing 8 Keys to Financial Security. “Pay yourself first. Protect your loved ones. Borrow sparingly. And don’t go for the home run…”  What a great, timeless article.

• Laura Rowley takes an heady look at the psychology of Understanding Money Behavior in a Financial Crisis.  “One of the keys to surviving the economic crisis, at least from a psychological perspective, is recognizing what you can and can’t control. And not doing destructive things while you’re powerless.”

I wish you a healthy and prosperous new year for 2009.  Sushi Money is two years old this month, and it’s been a grand experiment in the personal finance blogging world.  I don’t how long I’ll continue to write here, and I may look for a different financial niche.  But its been a lot of fun.  One of my goals includes are greater focus on philanthropy.  I’m in little position personally to make significant philantrophic gifts, but I am very thankful for the time and resources I do have available. Maybe there’s some kind of venture in the making.  

In times like these it’s important not to forget those who are struggling.  The economy will gain traction slowly, but there will be many who are left behind.  As we strengthen our own financial lives, it seems a good time to try and help a few others along the way.

It’s been a busy month with the holidays, and equally busy keeping up with the economic news, most of which isn’t very good.  But at the pump we’re all smiles these days with gas prices hitting five year lows.  Believe it or not I saw gas selling for $1.29 yesterday.  That is amazing, and to think of how much money Americans have wasted over the past couple of years in terms of fuel is even more amazing. 

Maybe wasted is a poor choice of words, but at least we’re not giving billions to third-world crazies anymore while the global recession has reduced demand (and speculation) incredibly.  The good news is how much we’re now saving here at home, and ”Tom Kloza of the Oil Price Information Service says Americans are paying about a billion dollars per day less than in July.”

At least that’s money people can use for other needs during one of the greatest recessions in decades.  But oil prices won’t stay this low forever, and some analysts see prices recovering later in 2009 or 2010 based on greatly reduced oil refinining capacity.  I hope that’s not the case- seems to me we got into the mess partly due to the fact that we didn’t have enough refineries or production capacity.  The big oil companies have little incentive at this point to expand their capacity however, so eventually demand and speculation will increase again.

Maybe we’ll be helped by better mileage cars and alternative energy?  Maybe.  I wouldn’t count on it, but every little bit helps.  That’s especially true in today’s economy, where many people are finding it difficult to juggle income against debt.  I hope you’re doing well at the end of such a tumultuous year, and that 2009 will be a whole lot better for all of us.

Bail-out this, and bail-out that.  I know it’s serious and the country is facing so many challenges.  But I’ve got to admit I’m tired of hearing about it all.  You would think Congress holds hearings and press conferences simply to amuse themselves.  Either that or they don’t have a clue about what to do at this point and are hoping for some magical consensus as a way out of the mess. 

But when I look into my heart of hearts, beyond my concerns about the wise use of taxpayer dollars and the exponential increase in the national debt, I also have to admit that I really hope we can put together some kind of a bailout package for the big-three U.S. auto makers- Ford, GM and Chrysler. 

It was hard to put those feelings into words exactly, but after watching banks fail and huge bailouts for the big Wall Street institutions, I was shaking my head wondering why we couldn’t put something together for the auto makers- the icons of American industrial greatness through generations.  After all- if these guys go bankrupt, then what about every supplier and finance company that are so deeply tied to them?  What about the untold thousands of employees whose jobs are linked to the auto industry?  What about all the mom and pop businesses that support and rely on those workers and companies?  And who (else?) is going to want to buy American cars, especially if they are worried about warranty’s, maintenance and a car company still being around in a few years?   

I could go on and on, but today I came across Ben Stein’s article, Bail Out Detroit - Now and I just couldn’t say it any better. 

“I get sick when I hear about how this or that professor says we cannot have bailouts in a free market. Really? How about the bailouts the professors get because gifts to colleges are tax free? How about the bailout they get because if they have to teach six hours a week they feel overwhelmed, while the guy on the line in Dearborn works a grueling forty and doesn’t whine about it?”

“Somehow, we can give bailouts to investment banks where the top dogs make hundreds of millions a year for running the company into the ditch and wrecking the whole credit picture in America. Somehow we can have bailouts for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, whose bosses were trading on the credit of the taxpayers to make themselves rich while pumping up a serious housing bubble.”

“Amazingly, we can have whole fleets of C-130’s fly to remote areas of Iraq and Afghanistan with pallets of hundred dollar bills piled from floor to ceiling. Then we can pass them out to warlords who make tea for our soldiers one hour and blow their guts out the next. We can send CIA operatives into Somalia and give millions, maybe hundreds of millions, to warlords to fight other killers.”

“But we cannot find it in our hearts to save our fellow Americans in Ohio and Michigan and Indiana who make the cars and trucks that about half of us buy? We can send billions to Germany and Japan to bail them out after they bombed us and killed our POWs and killed six million Jews. But we cannot help the children and grandchildren of the men and women who fought our war and made us the arsenal of democracy?”

“Something is very wrong here.”

“…And why are we so angry at the car companies’ executives? They get miserable pay by Wall Street standards and have much harder jobs. Why are we so angry at the unions? They negotiated their deals in good faith. It’s not their fault that roller coaster gasoline prices messed up their world. They are our brothers and sisters. They fight our wars. They maintain our middle class lives. Maybe they get paid a lot, but they have been giving back for years. When will it ever be enough? And what about the retirees? They get the benefits they were promised. If those can be taken away, then whose benefits are safe? And do you think it will be cheaper if the government takes on those costs directly?”

“Let’s stop the Depression before it starts. Let’s show some fairness and good faith to our own. Let’s bail out the Big Three, help them slim down, shape up, and keep making great cars and trucks. The Big Three are us and if we cannot help ourselves, who can we help?”

 Bailing out Ford, GM and Chrysler is the right answer, and I hope our legislators get it right- or at least get it started right.  It’s not going to be an easy road, or the final answer.  It will take time and the taxpayers are going to pony up for a lot of it.  But it’s who we are, and in the end- if we let these guys fail altogether, it’s going to cost us a heck of lot more.

*** Update ***  Apparently the Treasury Secretary’s plan does NOT include plans for current homeowners to refinance their loans.  So while many of us may sit on mortgage loans at greater than 6% or 7%, this plan would allow neighbors to move in to their house with a new mortgage loan with much lower payments.   This seems wrong… it may be a temporary fix, but how will it help millions of current homeowners who are having trouble making payments on their current mortgage loans? 

This week we found out we’re officially in a recession, and have been since around December, 2007.  The market has been wallowing at multi-year lows and layoffs have been increasing.  In light of so many economic challenges, it’s hard to see any bright spots that can move us forward.  But what about a lower mortgage payment?  Would a couple hundred extra bucks each month really make a difference, or help people purchase a house?

For many of us, it just might.  That’s the focus area of the government recently- mortgage loans and the possibility that a U.S. sponsored wave of mortgage activity and refinancing could bolster both the housing market and the economy as a whole. 

“The plan, which is in the development stage, would temporarily use the clout of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to encourage banks to lend at rates as low as 4.5%, more than a full point lower than prevailing rates for standard 30-year fixed-rate mortgages.”

“The plan is very similar to an idea floated in October by R. Glenn Hubbard and Christopher Mayer, academics at Columbia University’s Business School. “I think a program to substantially bring down rates for homebuyers would be an incredibly valuable program, and I think it captures a real part of solving what has been an incredibly challenging dislocation in the credit markets,” Mr. Mayer said in an interview. He estimated the idea under consideration could quickly help 1.5 million to 2.5 million people buy homes, giving a major boost to the housing market and broader economy.”

Certainly people would still need to qualify for the mortgage and have decent credit ratings to do so.  But a 30-year loan at 4.5% ?  Sign me up… not only would the monthly payment for many of us decrease, we would be able to focus more on reducing debt levels and increasing consumer spending.  *** Not for current homeowners! ***

“…Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson views lowering mortgage rates as key to fixing the housing crisis; hence the mortgage-security-buying program announced last week.  The most important thing we can do to mitigate foreclosures and progress through the housing correction,” Mr. Paulson said in a speech Monday, “is to reduce the cost of mortgage finance, so more families can afford to buy a home and so homeowners can refinance into more affordable mortgages.”

I have to agree (for once) with Secretary Paulson- making homeownership more affordable for credit-worthy families sounds like a great idea.  As long as we aren’t handing out loans to people that can’t repay them… hopefully we’ve learned that lesson already. 

Just for kicks I ran the numbers on the difference between the monthly payment for a 6.5% 30 year fixed-rate loan, and the same loan at 4.5%.  These numbers are for principal and interest only and don’t include taxes or insurance payments:

• 6.5% 30-year fixed-rate loan:   Monthly payment of $1,137.72
• 4.5% 30-year fixed-rate loan:   Monthly payment of $ 912.03

Okay, so we save about $225 bucks a month with the new mortgage. That’s not chump-change, and lots of folks can qualify for a 4.5% loan that would not otherwise qualify for a 6.5% loan.  Even refinancing is a great idea as long as we’re planning to stay in that house for a few years or more.   *** Not for current homeowners! ***

A Rush Into Refinancing may be just what the country needs right now however. But the new plan may not even include this option!  

I thought that’s what the Treasury Secretary was aiming for, and how they believe it can help dig out the country from the current housing mess.  Get more people into homes sitting empty out there, and make those monthly payments more affordable for all of us.  Good idea, but if they exclude current homeowners, then I don’t see how it helps the economy en masse.

By the way, what’s even more important over the long term on that interest rate scenario?  Think about how much interest you would be saving. 

• 6.5% 30-year fixed-rate loan:  Total interest paid $229,587
• 4.5% 30-year fixed-rate loan:  Total interest paid $148,336

That lower rate loan would save us over $81,000 dollars!!!

Sounds pretty good to me- that would pay for a kitchen and bath remodel, or even a few new cars over the lifetime of that mortgage loan. 

So is it time to buy that house you’ve been looking for?  Time to wade into real estate again?  Well, the real estate debate continues, and there are many opinions.   Even if a lot of us can think of several really good real estate deals out there, the money’s just not there right now.  And that’s part of the problem- with the stock market down, real income down, and folks losing their jobs, we’re running out of people that can qualify to purchase real estate.  

Maybe, just maybe, lower long term mortgage rates will help us climb out of this whirlpool?  Hard to say- that whirlpool is also a downward spiral… and deflation can take a long time to work out of.  Just ask the Japanese.

It’s been a busy couple of weeks and a nice break over the weekend.  Amazingly it’s already December… I’m all for supporting the economy, but I didn’t join the shopping melee last Friday.  I find myself holding back and shopping a little more carefully these days.  In fact I’ll shop more on the internet than in retail stores, looking for bargains here and there.   Today is supposed to be Cyber Monday for shopping online, but it looks more like Red Monday with the stock market after a key manufacturing index fell to a 26 year low.

Beyond the economic news there’s incredible unrest around the world these days, and now travelers have much to be concerned about.  If the events in India tell us anything, it’s that we must keep up the fight for freedom and against terrorism.  How can we live and grow as free nations around the world if we allow other countries such as Pakistan and Somalia to harbor or export such people?  This is not a simple fix, but will require generational change to overcome.  Hopefully we’ll see it happen in our lifetime.

In Thailand there are hundreds of thousands of travelers stranded at airports around the country trying to get home because of protesting within the nation.  And this at nearly the peak of the tourist season.   Civil unrest in Thailand and other countries is going to impact tourism in a huge way, and deepen the economic crisis for many people.  But the Thai government recognizes the impact and is trying to support tourists through lodging and food allowances while the protests continue.

“Tourism Minister Weerasak said the government will set aside as much as 400 million baht ($11 million) from its budget to pay for hotels and food for stranded tourists. Tourism generates about 1 trillion baht in revenue each year, he said.”

“The government will pay 2,000 baht per person per day for hotels and food,” Weerasak said. “We think we need to spend this to take good care of the tourists. We will try our best to make them feel taken care of.”

When I read such news I must say I am thankful in so many ways.  Doesn’t quite give one the travel bug does it?!  And it puts the economic challenges we face in a better perspective.  We’ve got work to do certainly, but we’ve got a strong foundation to build upon and people willing to work.  Soon we’ll have a new President and administration, as well as a host of minions running around Washington D.C. trying to get things going in a new direction.  Between all the new economic experts and a January stimulus bill, the news is bound to get better eventually.  What happens between now and then is a good question!

With the holidays upon us it’s time to decorate and focus more on home and family.  We won’t be doing much traveling, except perhaps closer to home.  Gas prices are helping the budget immensely, and that’s one more reason to be thankful.  Have a great week.

That’s pantry fellas, okay?  You know, that closet or cupboard where you keep your food and canned goods?  I looked around ours recently and discovered we’ve got a lot more food on hand than we realized.  Maybe not fresh foods like milk and eggs, but if push came to shove we could probably go a month without a major shopping trip.  That’s not even counting what’s in the freezer.   With thoughts like these it’s no wonder we’re reading about consumer spending taking a huge dive last month:

“The Commerce Department reported Friday that retail sales fell by 2.8 percent last month, the biggest drop on record, surpassing the old mark of a 2.65 percent plunge in November 2001 that occurred after the terrorist attacks. The October sales decline was led by a huge fall in auto purchases, but sales of all types of products suffered as consumers, worried about their jobs and the market turbulence, cut back sharply on spending.”

“The dismal report on retail sales was worse than the 2 percent decline that analysts expected. It marked the fourth straight decrease, the longest stretch of weakness on record. Retailers are braced for what could be the worst holiday shopping season in decades with economists forecasting a recession that could turn out to be the steepest since the 1981-82 downturn.”

“A survey of the nation’s big chain retail stores found that retailers suffered through the weakest October in at least 39 years even though they tried to gin up more sales by a frenzied round of price cutting.”

Of course there’s a bright side to a retail downturn…  discounts and sales everywhere.   Now retail doesn’t usually include grocery stores, but I know folks are cutting back there too.  The stores are quieter and emptier.  Except for Wal-Mart.  I made the mistake of going to Wal-Mart on a Friday a week ago- holy cow!

Having grown up through the ‘81-’82 downturn, I’m not sure I learned anything of significance either, especially because I was young and single, and didn’t have a family or home to support.  But we scrambled with multiple jobs and did what we had to do… worked, saved and pinched pennies.  I do remember running out of gas a few times… that was embarassing, but more a reflection of my lack of foresight than anything else.   You know what else was lack of foresight?  Not investing on a disciplined basis each year at the time- I probably gave up a decade or more of investment returns over the length of the 1980’s bull market.   But that’s another story.

As I ponder the current state of affairs it strikes me that most of us have a lot more resources at hand than we may realize.  And that’s also because most of us plan ahead a little bit, and try to stay prepared for whatever might come.  If I look in the pantry, the garage and a few other places, I realize we have a lot of stuff.  Some of it is even useful.  If things get really tough, we’ll be fine for a while.  We’ve already cut back, and we have room to cut back more if we need to.  Admittedly lots of other folks may not, and we’ll need to help them where we can. 

All across America starting this weekend the Boy Scouts and Cub Scouts have their annual food drive to gather donations and help people.  So many of the local food pantry and shelters really need the donations.  Looking at our household pantry I know we have a lot of cans we can give to help another family with Thanskgiving this month.

But if you’ve read Sushi Money at all before, you know I’m not one who believes we’re falling into another Great Depression.  Heck they haven’t even called it a recession formally yet.  But when they do (oh, they most assuredly will!), the recession will probably have started around the middle of 2008. 

We don’t know when this recession will end.  We don’t know how deep it will be, or what will help trigger the turnaround.  But to get the nation moving and growing again means we’ve got to foster business and public works.  And James Stewart’s approach to How Obama Can Fix the Economy makes as much sense as anything I’ve heard from Congress or the Treasury Secretary.  The new President will have a full plate, and a lot of motivation for changing the economic course we’re on right now.   I don’t envy his job, but is there a better time to be a new President than with the economy on the ropes?  Looks like opportunity to me.  

It’s an amazing day as President-elect Obama sweeps to victory, winning both the largest and the key states in the nation.  The electoral vote signaled a huge margin even as the nation still faces the red-blue popular split that divides much of America.   Yet winning the Presidency is an historic moment filled with change and promise as never before.  His victory speech was positive, hopeful and strong.

“I just received a very gracious call from Senator McCain. He fought long and hard in this campaign, and he’s fought even longer and harder for the country he loves. He has endured sacrifices for America that most of us cannot begin to imagine, and we are better off for the service rendered by this brave and selfless leader. I congratulate him and Governor Palin for all they have achieved, and I look forward to working with them to renew this nation’s promise in the months ahead.”

President-elect Obama framed his victory describing his vision for the future in bright, hopeful words.

“What began twenty-one months ago in the depths of winter must not end on this autumn night. This victory alone is not the change we seek – it is only the chance for us to make that change. And that cannot happen if we go back to the way things were. It cannot happen without you.”

“So let us summon a new spirit of patriotism; of service and responsibility where each of us resolves to pitch in and work harder and look after not only ourselves, but each other. Let us remember that if this financial crisis taught us anything, it’s that we cannot have a thriving Wall Street while Main Street suffers – in this country, we rise or fall as one nation; as one people.”

We don’t know where the nation is headed, but for many voters, change is the key, and the new President has called for a great new direction.

“…This is our chance to answer that call. This is our moment. This is our time – to put our people back to work and open doors of opportunity for our kids; to restore prosperity and promote the cause of peace; to reclaim the American Dream and reaffirm that fundamental truth – that out of many, we are one; that while we breathe, we hope, and where we are met with cynicism, and doubt, and those who tell us that we can’t, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people:”

“Yes We Can. Thank you, God bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.”

There is much to be proud of in America. Not only the wonder and strength of our democracy and the free electoral process, but for the hopes and dreams of so many, for so long. Regardless of our disagreements, we must continue trying to work together for a better future. Congratulations President-elect Obama!

In these last days before the election I find myself amazed at the emotions and tactics of the political candidates and their followers, on both sides of the aisle and at both the national and local level.  This surely is one of the most fascinating, if not important elections we have faced in decades. Today I’m stepping out of the financial discussion to share a few thoughts on the election.  This may frustrate or disappoint some of you, and it may please others.  Whether you agree or disagree, that’s fine.  I respect your views and the choice that’s right for you.  I’ll even try to put up a guest post with opposing views if someone sends it in.  But for today, here’s mine:

Who am I voting for?  McCain.  Why?  Primarily because I believe he has a better vision for the future of the nation, as well as a philosophy that strengthens rather than weakens the foundations of society over time. 

I’m voting for McCain not only in terms of my views on national security or economics, but more importantly in considering the basic elements of what one believes about freedom and democracy.   At the heart of these beliefs, for me, is an understanding that the individual in society is the strength of that same society. Whatever we do to help grow, foster, improve and assist that individual in realizing their potential and expanding their ability to contribute to society is essential both for them and the nation as a whole.  

One of the growing socio-economic buzzwords is the term human capital.  Human capital refers basically to the inherent skills and knowledge that an individual may possess in order to contribute to society and produce economic value both personally and for that society.   One of the hallmarks of America has been to establish a foundation of freedom that allows this tremendous drive by individuals to grow and succeed, personally and professionally, and to seek ”…life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”    I prefer to think of it the same way as Benjamin Franklin:

“All the constitution guarantees is the pursuit of happiness. You have to catch up with it by yourself.”              

The expansion of human capital through the economic fabric of our free American democracy has arguably fostered the greatest revolution of invention and creative genius in history.  Yet it isn’t perfect.  What society is?  Even with the current economic challenges we face, the grand experiment of American democracy has been an incredible success story that continues to foster industrial, technological and environmental change throughout the world.  More importantly it places people first, acknowledging both the value of human rights and the value of human life.  Something that far too often is forgotten about most of the world in which we live.

We owe that strength and genius not to the nation of America itself, but rather to its people.  And the only way we are going to continue fostering the strength of the American nation over time is to continue empowering people as individuals, and not as recipients of government programs and largesse that increasingly demands adherence and holds their future hostage. 

I read a message on one of the news sites today that was interesting.  I think it’s a creative story and not a real event, but it makes an interesting point:

“Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read “Vote Obama, I need the money.” I laughed. Once in the restaurant my server had on a “Obama 08″ tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference- just imagine the coincidence. When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need–the homeless guy outside….”

Maybe the waiter would actually smile, and say “Good idea!” if this were to happen.  Probably not however, because few of us like having our money taken from us and being told we must give it to others.  Choosing to do so is one thing.  Not having that choice is another.

I believe Obama’s vision of change and “economic justice” to be lacking in understanding for the basics of freedom and democracy, and that it devalues rather than empowers the individual in society over time.

And quite frankly I would rather politicians work to legislate for structural  economic foundations, with evolving regulatory approaches, that support free enterprise rather than redirecting the hard work and success of some to those that may do little to earn it.  I believe the dreams, creative vision and efforts of hard-working Americans actually lift up the nation over time, and that if we make taxes too burdensome, and focus on re-distributing the products of their success to those who do not earn it can only serve to undermine the fabric of the nation.

I do believe we must give and share with those who may not ever be able to achieve or survive on their own, or without help in so many areas.  But giving of your own volition is one thing.  Having your money taken and being told that you must do so is another.  Rather than government deciding who are the deserving among society to receive the wealth of others, we must foster a nation that lifts up the poorest and those who are struggling. 

We can teach, train, volunteer, and give of ourselves in so many ways, and government can help establish programs and structures to facilitate those goals.  But economic justice is far more than being “neighborly” by taxing the rich, and handing out money to the poor.  It’s a balance to be sure, but Obama’s views- and those of Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd, etc., are balanced much too far to the left.

Essentially I think America needs McCain more right now than we need Obama. 

Yet from the polls, media blitz and just about every other indicator, it looks like Obama has some incredible force that may sweep him into the Presidency this election.  If so then perhaps I’m voting with the minority.  Maybe the nation needs a pyschological shift of energy or some zen-like aura of charismatic change that Obama seems to bring for so many people.   But I just don’t see it.  I would rather focus on McCain’s experience and practical approach to moving the nation forward, rather than some lofty, unscripted vision of change. 

In the car this morning I actually heard two religious hymns being sung with Obama’s name in them, holding him up even as “holy.”  I have to admit that was a little shocking to me, and I’m not even an ardent religious observer.  I have to wonder if in times of national challenge or crisis that people might be flocking to someone new, someone they want to believe in and that can “save” America?  Have many of our fellow Americans replaced their religious views with a secular perspective that is looking somewhere for hope, and are they now looking toward Obama to provide that level of dramatic change?  Maybe so.  Whoever wins the Presidency, I do think the country will be fine.  But it’s going to be a very interesting ride depending upon the direction we take.

Spent a great weekend mostly outdoors enjoying some beautiful Autumn weather.  Don’t you just love this time of year?  The leaves are changing colors, the air is crisp and cool, and it gives us a chance to catch up on things we’ve put off for too long. It’s also just plain fun to explore the countryside and get out a little more, especially with lower gas prices! We even marched in a parade this weekend, listening to the sounds of a high school band.  For all the challenges the nation faces, it’s great to see people involved in the community and enjoying the timeless traditions each year.

Gas prices in our area have fallen drastically in recent weeks.  You can sense relief at the pump when filling up.  It’s all part of the great unwinding of leverage.  The more we read about the financial mess it appears that hedge funds and other large insitutions have caused much of the drop in share prices through liquidation of investments in order to raise cash.   Some people believe this unwinding will continue with more downward pressure on stocks.  Others believe we’re close to a bottom, and even Warren Buffet is pitching to buy stocks right now.

As for oil prices, we don’t see those “experts” talking about $200 or $300 oil anymore. In fact, many people believe oil could fall below $60 a barrel for some time, and OPEC is scrambling to put production cuts to shore up prices.  

“OPEC, supplier of about 40 percent of the world’s oil, may pare output by 1 to 2 million barrels a day in stages to stabilize prices, said Chakib Khelil, the group’s president. Deutsche Bank AG lowered its 2009 crude oil price estimate by 35 percent to $60 a barrel, citing the possibility of a “major world recession.”  

Maybe they’ll succeed for a time, but how anyone can say that consumer demand was the primary reason for the runup of oil prices is beyond me.  Yes, there is huge demand for oil- too much demand as the U.S. is dependent on foreign oil and prices rose sharply. But that is only because supply was so restricted, and speculation by investors also impacted demand.  Speculation has played an enormous role in our oil markets in recent years and now we’re seeing prices stabilize with the unwinding of leverage and credit crisis impacts. 

But guess what?  Lower oil prices may not last beyond a few months or a year or two because the world’s appetite for oil continues to increase and we’re still not producing enough here in the U.S.

There is real demand for oil globally, and there are only so many places we can get our oil from. So yes, the price we pay for oil will be driven by the demand and the supply of oil we can produce or import over time.  Investors will also return to the oil markets and at some point we’ll see prices rise again.  Let’s hope that between increased production in the U.S. and reduced demand through higher mileage and alternative vehicles, that prices won’t rise quite as high as they did this year.

****************

In other news I will say that I was bothered that Barack Obama raised over $150 million dollars during the month of September alone.  That’s more than George Bush and John Kerry raised combined during the 2004 election!   Why does that bother me?  Mostly because he’s taking money from private sources, instead of public funding like John McCain.

With public funding, we know where it comes from, who gives it, and there are detailed records and accountability.  Senator Obama had earlier pledged to stick to public funding, but later changed his mind and broke that promise, taking millions from private sources instead.  Where is that money coming from?  Who are the people and institutions that are “buying their way” into the campaign coffers of one of our Presidential candidates?  

I’m no expert but I thought that campaign finance reform was supposed to reduce that type of thing?  In any event, Senator McCain is not lacking for funding either, although he’s behind Obama.  McCain received a big chunk of matching dollars to help finance his campaign:

“Helping Sen. McCain keep up was the one-time, $84.1 million in taxpayer matching money he received in September. Sen. Obama won’t get such a one-time payment because he opted out of public financing after first suggesting he would participate, a decision that has cost him some political points.”

“Public financing gives candidates taxpayer money for their campaigns, but it also requires them to hew to spending limits and essentially stop fund raising for themselves during the general election. The parties can continue raising money for the candidates; however, much of their spending must be conducted independent of the presidential campaigns. By opting out of public financing, Sen. Obama is free to spend as much as he can raise.”

“McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said the campaign can overcome the fund-raising mismatch. “We are going to be competitive because, despite Barack Obama’s best efforts, this is an election not an auction,” he said.”

“The Obama campaign has also fielded criticism from Republicans for what they say is a lack of donor transparency. Federal rules don’t require disclosure of donors giving less than $200. Small donors account for about half of Sen. Obama’s 3.1 million contributors.”

I will say that I’m tired of being bombarded with tv advertisements for the candidates. We don’t watch much tv, but do have it on in the evenings.  The “I’m so-and-so, and I approve this message” line is getting really annoying.  I find myself hitting the mute button, regardless of which candidate’s advertisements are playing.

I do have a preference for one candidate over the other at this point, but I would rather not make this a politically focused discussion.  I will say that I think the nation is so much greater than any one candidate, President or their administration.  If I have any concerns, it is more about a possible Liberal Supermajority taking over the nation’s highest offices as President and in Congress.  I don’t think either party should have a lock on both Congress and the Presidency.  That gives the politicians nearly free reign to pass whatever legislation they think is okay. 

Yet regardless of who is elected this year, I think we’ll be fine.  Both Senator McCain and Senator Obama should be able to gather effective representation within their party to lead the country through the recovery over the next four years.  It may be a little more painful in some areas such as taxation or spending cuts, but we’ll get through it.  I think the nation’s political focus also goes in cycles.  It may be time for more change than many of us are prepared for!  But in another four years we can revisit the process once again.  Have a good week.

Well then.  A day to be in the markets.  Nearly an 11% gain in one day, after losing 18% last week. 

Last week was the worst week ever for the Dow… and Today was the best day ever for the Dow. 

It almost presents some zen-like Yin and Yang investing paradox as we struggle to understand how it affects us.

So what’s it mean really?  Does this mean we’ve hit a bottom?  Is the pain over?  Does our retirement portfolio head back in the other direction?   Questions many of us want to know.  But the market is funny that way.  Not funny “ha ha” but funny as in fickle:  There really are few definitive answers.  As much as we would like to know that it’s time to start investing again, we look the other way and the market has taken off somewhere else. 

So was last week the value investors opportunity of a liftetime?  Or was today really just a bear market rally?

My humble opinion:  Last week was a bottom for the short term.  Much easier calling in retrospect, huh? We may take off on a bumpy ride toward 10,000 or 11,000 on the Dow.  But let’s be realistic- the market was extremely oversold last week, and many companys’ stocks were selling for less than they were worth.   We were due for a rally… BUT!  Does that mean the credit crisis has changed?  No.  The U.S. and other countries throughout the world face many economic challenges ahead.  The landscape has changed just enough to provide hope and encouragement over the short term.  Meanwhile we watch the housing and mortgage markets, the jobs reports and the earnings reports, and we know that we may struggle through a recession or other challenges ahead.

We obviously don’t know what tomorrow brings. But here is an excellent article that shows how Keeping Your Money in the Market is a long term strategy for success.  Stocks have not been this cheap in several decades.  

But knowing that we don’t know what’s ahead, many people have figured out that they are not willing to risk their money in the stock market anymore.  Lots of folks have flocked to CD’s for a safe and sure return.  Nothing wrong with that at all, especially with a 4%-5% yield over 5 years.   

Are you that risk averse?  If investing bothers you that much, then you need to sit down with your advisor or planner and figure out a more conservative asset allocation.  If you’re handling your investments yourself, maybe sitting down with a financial planner can help as well anyway.  A year ago I talked about risk tolerance in the context of real estate investing.  It’s worth examining a little more closely, and better late than never.

The time to decide you are not comfortable losing money in a particular market investment choice is ideally before you put money there! But most of us learn things a little harder, through experience. Knowing our risk tolerance is not hard, but making decisions appropriate to our risk tolerance often is.

Risk tolerance is a very personal thing, and there are few right answers. What is right for you may not be right for me. What is right for your spouse may not be right for you, so you will need to strike a balance or an agreement for your investing goals and allocation. Risk tolerance is also tied to the time horizon for your investment goals.

If you’re saving for a down payment on home, your risk tolerance should necessarily be very low and your assets should be in a savings or money market account. If you’re examining risk tolerance in terms of retirement in 20 years, that presents a whole new perspective. The ancient Greek saying “Know Thyself” is very appropriate. We are trying to work with a level of risk that is appropriate to our goals, time horizon and personal level of comfort.

Many studies have been done to investigate consumer risk tolerance, and basically the studies show that people are normally far more conservative than they think. In other words, we often think we are willing to handle degrees of risk, but when it comes to losing money, we are not prepared for risk at all. Here are some tools you can use to analyze your own tolerance for risk:

• MSN/Money Online Risk Tolerance Quiz: A quick online assessment of risk tolerance.

The following are printable .pdf files:

• Investment Risk Tolerance Quiz: An excellent risk tolerance quiz courtesy of North Dakota State University, by J.E. Grable and R.H. Lytton.
• Risk Tolerance Quiz: This is a useful risk tolerance questionnaire from Richard D. Margarian. Use your answer choice as the points for each question, then total them up at the end.
• Retirement Risk Tolerance: A short analysis form that looks at risk from a retirement goal perspective.

There’s also few things better than a good second opinion. If you want objective advice and a closer examination of risk and asset allocation, find a professional Certified Financial Planner in your area using the Financial Planning Association’s search tool.

And one other note:  If like many people, you’re just not looking at it anymore… well that’s called “The Ostrich Method of Investing.”  Might be okay if you’ve established some long term goals for 10-20 years from now, but it doesn’t always work out the way you might think!   Especially if you need money over the short term. 

For those who really believe the future is pretty bleak for the next 10-15 years, then maybe you do want to find a safe place to keep your money.  But I’m not going to bet against America, or the ingenuity of a whole bunch of folks that love business and capitalism. 

Besides, too many people like finding ways to make money. Greed is a heck of a motivator.  And from my perspective, the stock market is a pretty good long term proxy for the success of our free market economy.